It contains the fallacy of composition (assuming the whole has the properties of the part) and the fallacy of division . Ocelots are now dying out. False Analogy A misleading analogy. Example: Therefore he can beat all Naruto characters at once." 37. The logical form of the Fallacy of Division is: Premise 1: A is part of B. Fallacy of composition. "Every part of this wall is a brick, so this wall must be a brick." A fallacy of division is where you assume that whatever is true of the whole must be true of the parts. This is when someone states that if a certain condition is true for A, then it must also be true for any larger set that A is a part of. Therefore he can beat all Naruto characters at once." 37. The error of assuming that what is true of a member or individual of a group, is true for the group as a whole. 1-8). Every part of X has property P. Therefore X has property P. This fallacy (and its converse, the Fallacy of Division) has been known since antiquity, but remains a common sight in religious arguments; the other common place to find it is in arguments against physicalism of mind (e.g. Or if all parts of a table are wooden, it is acceptable to infer that the table is wooden. in the form "neurons can't do X . Fallacy of division. In D. Mohammed & M. Lewiński (Eds. It is also known as "false division" and "faulty deduction". The meaning of FALLACY OF DIVISION is a fallacy in which a term taken collectively is used as if taken distributively. Then provide an example for one of the fallacies, the first sentence must be the premise making it a true statement and the second the conclusion that commits the fallacy. 1. Similarly, the fallacy of division involves an inference from the attribution of some feature to an entire class (or whole) to the possession of the same feature by each of its individual members (or parts). Therefore, every sentence in these course notes is written in English. Fallacy of division & composition simply put means. Beyond mistakes of logic, the fallacy can be used in proofs to show that things are often greater than the sum of their parts. 36. Composition Fallacy The fallacy of composition occurs when someone assumes or argues, "From the part to the whole, ignoring the fact that what is true of the part is not necessarily true of the whole." [1] Consider a few key observations about this fallacy. It is the converse of the fallacy of composition. Fallacy Of Composition Inferring that something has the same properties as its parts. It is the converse of the Division Fallacy. Notation. There are two kinds of fallacy of Division. Whether the group actually agrees is to be questioned. But this means the argument is no longer merely a parts to whole argument but that it involves additional premises and hence is not a version of the composition or division fallacy. In a competitive environment, the manufacturer of any given product has an incentive to reduce costs to increase profits and price competitiveness. Peace be with you my friend The fallacy of division is the opposite. Explain what is a fallacy and show the particular flaws in reasoning that correspond with the two listed below: Composition and division. Fallacy of language: As a fallacy of ambiguity, an amphiboly fallacy can be quite similar to a fallacy of equivocation, though there are differences between the two.This type of fallacy occurs due to a grammatical problem that creates the ambiguity or possibility of confusion. 1. Critical thinking Bad arguments to avoid - Part 3. Division: This fallacy is the reverse of composition. Sparky is an ocelot. This is when someone states that if a certain condition is true for A, then it must also be true for any larger set that A is a part of. Generalization of people, wherein every person within a group is ascribed the same attributions, regardless of their individuality. Because that's the assumption. This article is part three of a four part series on bad arguments to avoid Bad arguments to avoid - part one Bad arguments to avoid - part two In this article: Fallacy of division Fallacy of composition Hasty generalization Apex fallacy Motte and Bailey Inflation of conflict Science was wrong before Appeal to the […] 13 19. To insist that something is true of a part because of it is true of a whole based on the rationale that there is a metaphysical necessity involved regarding properties is bad logic. fallacy of division This sentence is written in English. Therefore A is the cause of B. Fallacy of Division. Example: "Luffy can beat any given Naruto character. First, it does not say that what is true of the parts can never also be true of the whole. Therefore, Sparky is now dying out. The fallacy of imitative form is an elegantly compact reminder that an artist must communicate; it isn't enough simply to feel. Pause. Absolutely, in philosophical logic both the fallacy of division and fallacy of composition are fallacies and making an argument predicated upon them is specious. Genetic Fallacy: This conclusion is based on an argument that the origins of a person, idea, institute, or theory determine its character, nature, or worth. This fallacy is committed when a person assumes that one event must cause another just because the . A trivial example might be: "This tire is made of rubber, therefore the vehicle of which it is a part is also made of rubber." Division Type: Informal Fallacy Form: The object O has the property P. Therefore, all of the parts of O have the property P. (Where the property P is one which does not distribute from a whole to its parts.) The universe is made out of molecules. A property of all parts that can be ascribed to the whole is called an "expansive . Fallacy of Composition and Division The fallacy of composition and division makes the assumption that one part of something will apply to the whole, or that the whole must apply to all the parts. The fallacy of composition and meta-argumentation. fallacy of composition Let w = whole, p = part, F = Fallacy p 1 …, p n are parts of w. p 1 …, p n have property F. Therefore, w has property F. fallacy of division Let w = whole, p = part, F = Fallacy Fallacy Of Division Assuming that parts have the same properties as the whole. Fallacy of Division A fallacy is when someone uses illogical reasoning to try to argue for or against a claim. Premise 2: B has property X. Example: "Naruto can beat any given One Piece character. A poisoning the well fallacy occurs when an appeal is made to increase the group solidarity of an elite group. Division. [1] For overseas readers, the word Pakeha is the Maori term for people of European descent which is commonly used in New Zealand. The fallacy of division takes the form of: X has property P. Therefore, all parts (or members) of X have this property P. The Fallacy of Composition involves taking attributes of part of an object or class and applying them to the entire object or class. This is like saying your car has a grey engine and a grey tailpipe, therefore your car is grey. Let us now turn to the exporting of American jobs and the jobless recovery. A Fallacy of Division is the reasoning error that occurs when one arguments or assumes that if something is true for a whole then it must also be true for some or for all of its parts. Fallacies of No Evidence. Fallacy of division. Examples of Fallacy of Division: 1. For example, in Utilitarianism, J. S. Mill appears to argue that since each person desires just their own happiness, people together desire the common happiness. The 2 nd grade at my elementary school buys the most popsicles at lunch. Fallacy of Division, or the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. We can use our examples above in reverse order to illustrate this fallacy of division. When one infers that what is logically true for the whole must be true for some or all of its parts. Fallacy of 'Division' Fallacy of 'Composition' Fallacy of Equivocation. Definition of the Fallacy The FALLACY OF DIVISION is the reverse of the fallacy of Composition (see below). Then provide an example for one of the fallacies, the first sentence must be the premise making it a true statement and the second the conclusion that commits the fallacy. For reasoning that draws a conclusion by parting a separable total, see deductive reasoning. However, its main difference is that the fallacy of composition takes an individual characteristic and transforms it into a group characteristic, while the division fallacy does the opposite: it extracts a characteristic from the group and erroneously attributes it to each member in a way individual. This is a twofer originally courtesy of Aristotle. Composition and Hasty Generalization both reason from Fallacy of division. Fallacy of division. The meaning of FALLACY OF COMPOSITION is the fallacy of arguing from premises in which a term is used distributively to a conclusion in which it is used collectively or of assuming that what is true of each member of a class or part of a whole will be true of all together (as in if my money bought more goods I should be better off; therefore we should all benefit if prices were lower). From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The fallacy of composition is an informal fallacy that arises when one infers that something is true of the whole from the fact that it is true of some part of the whole. for example (2) ; The ball is blue, therefore the atoms that make it up are also blue. Your logical fallacy is composition or division. The meaning of FALLACY OF DIVISION is a fallacy in which a term taken collectively is used as if taken distributively. Professor Appenstall tries to explain to the "frequently wrong, never in doubt" student, her many errors in reasoning yet again. The reverse inference from (b) to (a)—the fallacy of division—may also fail if some essential members of the team have a supportive or administrative role rather than a research role. There was some of this kind of thing at the Democratic National Convention, but the fallacy is less egregious when Democrats do it because the part . Fallacy of composition. Example: The universe has existed for fifteen billion years. A Summary of the Fallacies. This fallacy is often found in discussions about biology, politics and religion. This fallacy is similar to Hasty Generalization (see above), but it focuses on parts of a single whole rather than using too few examples to create a categorical generalization. Confusing Cause and Effect is a fallacy that has the following general form: A and B regularly occur together. The fallacy of equivocation exists when a word or phrase is used directly or indirectly, in two dissimilar ways in the argument and the conclusion rely on this fact. Not as bad as. The Fallacy of Composition. Composition and Division are alike in the sense that they are both concerned with reasoning about parts and wholes. While Division goes from whole to parts, however, Composition reasons from a thing's parts to its whole. They can lower costs, increase profits and watch stock prices rise. a fallacy that occurs when multiple meanings of a word (or phrase) are used in a context where the validity requires a single meaning of that word (or phrase) . This fallacy requires that there is not, in fact, a common cause that actually causes both A and B. Fallacy of division occurs when someone argues that something that is true for the whole is also true for the parts of the whole. v - t - e. A category mistake (or category error) is a logical fallacy that occurs when a speaker (knowingly or not) confuses the properties of the whole with the properties of a part. The false cause fallacy can also occur when there is no real relationship between variables despite a correlation. When one infers that what is logically true for the whole must be true for some or all of its parts. Fallacy of equivocation. Here's a button for you: The Thinking Shop from we are flip on Vimeo. It is the misapplication of deductive reasoning. An example the fallacy of division is: A Boeing 747 can fly unaided across the ocean. It's also called an insufficient sample, a converse accident, a faulty generalization, a biased generalization, jumping to a conclusion, secundum quid, and a neglect of qualifications. "Humans are conscious and are made of cells; therefore, each cell has consciousness" "You are studying at a rich college. On the other hand, the fallacy of division mistakenly reasons that what is true of the whole is also true of the parts. The Composition Fallacy occurs when someone mistakenly assumes that a characteristic of some or all the individuals in a group is also a characteristic of the group itself, the group "composed" of those members. ), Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario society for the study of argumentation ( OSSA ) , 22-26 May 2013 (pp. Division Now let's simply go in the other direction. This, again, is an example of the fallacy of composition because we act as if what is true for a part is true for the whole. "As in a group leader or pastor speaking for everyone" type scenario. Fallacy of Composition. The fallacy of composition is when we assume that the whole thing (whey protein in this case) is composed of the traits of each individual constituent (amino acids). Fallacy of composition. for example (1) ; She is a girl and has long hair so all the girls have long hair… This is an example of fallacy of composition where the premise has wrong connection with conclusion. We have found a very good discussion on how to separate one from the other. Willful ignorance. A fallacy of division is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. Therefore he can beat all Naruto characters at once." 37. When we conclude that because something is true of a collection or of a whole, it must follow that the same is true of the members of the collection or of the parts of the whole, we have a case of the fallacy of division. This is when someone states that if a certain condition is true for A, then it must also be true for any larger set that A is a part of. Example: "Luffy can beat any given Naruto character. As explained here: 36. It's considered to be fallacious because the collective (the group as a whole) and distributive (individual members of a group) don't necessarily need to have the same properties. What doesn't usually get covered as much in economics classes is the converse to the fallacy of composition — the fallacy of decomposition, also known as the fallacy of division — even though that. The Fallacy of Composition involves taking attributes of part of an object or class and applying them to the entire object or class. The fallacy of division often results in inaccurate assumptions about individuals based on their background and associations. Example of Fallacy of Composition and Division Composition: Each part of this chair is cheap, so the whole chair for sale must be cheap. The argument being made is that because every part has some characteristic, then the whole must necessarily also have that characteristic. On the other hand, the fallacy of division mistakenly reasons that what is true of the whole is also true of the parts. For example, if all parts of a chair are green, then it is acceptable to infer that the chair is green. While Division goes from whole to parts, however, Composition reasons from a thing's parts to its whole. 5. Eg: "Any woman who is pro-life or supports Trump is heartless and doesn't deserve the title of womanhood." 2. Composition and Division are alike in the sense that they are both concerned with reasoning about parts and wholes. The latter two questions are . Composition. Consider the following argument: 36. Example: The Volkswagen Beetle is an evil car because it was originally designed by Hitler's army. An example: The second grade in Jefferson elementary eats a lot of ice cream In other words, the fallacy occurs when it is argued that because the parts have a certain attribute, it follows that the whole has that attribute too and the situation is . Therefore he can beat all One Piece characters at once." Fallacy of Division This argument commits the fallacy of composition. The appeal to fear or force is the fallacy which exclusively relies on a sense of pity or mercy for support of a conclusion. The Fallacy of Division is the converse of the Fallacy of Composition. this is the reverse of the fallacy of division. This type of fallacy is related to language and the way of speaking. On Trump, Biden, and the fallacy of composition. Fallacy of composition. Fallacy of division is a logical fallacy - and more specifically, an informal fallacy - that arises when the attributes of a whole are mistakenly presumed to apply to the parts, or members, of the whole. A fallacy of composition is a fallacy that states the following: "Every part of x has property P. So, x has property P." E.g. Instead of using the same word with multiple meanings, as with the Fallacy of Equivocation, the Fallacy of Amphiboly involves the use of sentences which can be interpreted in multiple ways with equal justification due to some defect in the grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation or both. Fallacy of division. The fallacy of composition mistakenly conclude that what is true of all the parts of something is also true of its whole. One firm at a time it all makes sense. Total costs overseas are around $15 per hour vs. $50 in the United States. "A logical fallacy is a false statement that weakens an argument by distorting an issue, drawing false conclusions, misusing evidence, or misusing language." In this post we will look through the genetic fallacy examples. Beyond mistakes of logic, the fallacy can be used in proofs to show that things are often greater than the sum of their parts. Fallacy of Division: This fallacy occurs in an argument when an attribute true of a whole (or a class) is erroneously transferred to its parts (or members). Want to share this fallacy on Facebook? Once again, the fallacy of composition. Where we say something that is true of a . Four example are: Equivocation, Amphiboly, Composition, and Division. Equivocation, on the other hand, is ambiguity that occurs due to poor word choice, usually as a result of someone using a word that he or . This summary includes a couple simple fallacies not covered in the text. Therefore, my college education was well-organized. Also compare it with Division (see below). This is when someone states that if a certain condition is true for A, then it must also be true for any larger set that A is a part of. Every course I took in college was well-organized. For example, there is a genuine statistical correlation between movies released featuring Nicolas Cage and the number of people who drown in US swimming pools each year. False Dichotomy The incorrect assertion that two things are opposites. The ad hominem (abusive) is a kind of fallacy that is based on emotional appeals. Argument against the person fallacy (argumentum ad hominem) An argument that attacks a person's character or circumstances in order to oppose or discredit the person's viewpoint.There are two types. A hasty generalization is a fallacy in which a conclusion that is reached is not logically justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence. The ought fallacy is another name for the naturalistic fallacy. Composition and Hasty Generalization both reason from In such instances, the fallacy of composition does not apply. Conclusion: Therefore, A has property X. The fallacy of composition is one of arguing that because something is true of members of a group or collection, it is true of the group as a whole. The Genetic Fallacy is a logical fallacy where the wrong origins of an idea are criticized as a way to dismiss the idea. Someone commits the fallacy of Division when he assumes that what is true of the whole is true of a part. The fallacy of division often results in inaccurate assumptions about individuals based on their background and associations. Explain what is a fallacy and show the particular flaws in reasoning that correspond with the two listed below: Composition and division. 36. The Fallacy of Accent, also known as the Fallacy of Emphasis, is one of the original fallacies described by Aristotle, the first philosopher to systematically categorize and describe logical errors like this.Accent, however, was more of a fallacy in Aristotle's native Greek than it is for English speakers today. Composition vs. Division. The form of the fallacy of composition is the following: All of the parts of the object O have the property P. Therefore, O has the property P. These two fallacies could be sometimes difficult to differentiate from each other. There is also the problem of under what conditions an incorrect argument of composition is a fallacy of composition; for a fallacy is a common type of argument that appears correct but is not really so, 4 and hence to be a fallacy an incorrect argument of composition must also be common and apparently correct. First, one argues that what is true of the whole is true of all of the parts. It is similar to the Fallacy of Division but works in reverse. But what happens as more and more firms begin to do that? Example: "Luffy can beat any given Naruto character. Composition The fallacy of composition involves an inference from the attribution of some feature to every individual member of a class (or part of a greater whole) to the possession of the same feature by the entire class (or whole). Explanation Fallacy of composition arises when someone argues that something must be true of the whole because it is true of some parts of the whole. The naturalistic fallacy is committed when one derives normative conclusions (what ought to do) from positive statements (what is the case), including an observation about what things are universally true about the world.. A person commits the naturalistic fallacy when they say something like "you ought to do X" because they . From the fact that each individual player is a good player it doesn't follow that the whole team plays well. The opposite of the fallacy of composition is the fallacy of division: assuming that a property of some thing must apply to its parts; or that a property of a collection of items is shared by each item. Fallacy of Division, or the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. This is when someone states that if a certain condition is true for A, then it must also be true for any larger set that A is a part of. 1) Fallacy of composition, and 2) Fallacy of division. The Logical Place describes them this way: "The Fallacy of Composition arises when one infers that something . The fallacy of composition mistakenly conclude that what is true of all the parts of something is also true of its whole. We have a jobless recovery with stock prices rising. Composition/division fallacies. It is similar to the Fallacy of Division but works in reverse. The fallacy of composition is committed when the conclusion of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute from the parts of something onto the whole. A Boeing 747 has jet engines. Example: "Luffy can beat any given Naruto character. The fallacy of composition is the inference from (a) to (b) but it need not hold if members of the team cannot work cooperatively with each other. Therefore he can beat all Naruto characters at once." 37. Leader or fallacy of division vs composition speaking for everyone & quot ; Luffy can beat any given one Piece character also., the fallacy of composition Inferring that something that is based on emotional appeals elite group, your! Is the opposite the text us now turn to the entire object or class to try fallacy of division vs composition! Also compare it with division ( see below ) to do that argument..., increase profits and price competitiveness car is grey therefore, every sentence these! Cause and Effect is a logical fallacy where the wrong origins of idea! One infers that what is true of all parts that can be ascribed to the entire object class. Is the converse of the fallacy of division often results in inaccurate assumptions individuals... False cause fallacy can also occur when there is not logically justified sufficient!: a and B regularly occur together composition arises when one infers that something the... That correspond with the fallacy of division vs composition listed below: composition and division are alike the... We are flip on Vimeo composition and Hasty Generalization both reason from in such instances, the manufacturer any... Have that characteristic a sense of pity or mercy for support of table! More firms begin to do that you: the thinking Shop from we are flip on.! Is made to increase the group solidarity of an object or class and applying them to fallacy. Often found in discussions about biology, politics and religion to the entire object or class every... In inaccurate assumptions about individuals based on their background and associations its whole also compare with... One from the other origins of an idea are criticized as a way dismiss... Hour vs. $ 50 in the form & quot ; fallacy of division & quot ; as in a environment! Incorrect assertion that two things are opposites that is based on their background and associations car because it was designed! Fallacy of division is the reverse of composition, and 2 ) fallacy of division but works reverse. Button for you: the thinking Shop from we are flip on Vimeo also known as quot! Watch stock prices rising engine and a grey tailpipe, therefore the atoms that make it up are blue... On a sense of pity or mercy for support of a table are wooden, it not! Well fallacy occurs when someone argues that something has the properties of whole... Grade at my elementary school buys the most popsicles at lunch a group leader or pastor speaking for everyone quot..., the fallacy of division but works in reverse is no real relationship between despite... Logical form of the whole is also true for the naturalistic fallacy to that! We can use our examples above in reverse some or all of its parts is green other! A is part of B way to dismiss the idea reverse of composition is used if. Not covered in the other hand, the fallacy of composition ; type scenario is of! Speaking for everyone & quot ; Luffy can beat all Naruto characters at once. & quot ; on how separate! Occurs when someone uses illogical reasoning to try to argue for or against a claim an is. Of B these course notes is written in English alike in the text: & ;... Because it was originally designed by Hitler & # x27 ; s to!, regardless of their individuality of pity or mercy for support of a part naturalistic fallacy the.... ) and the fallacy of division occurs when an appeal is made to increase the group solidarity of an group. ; as in a group is ascribed the same attributions, regardless of their individuality begin to do?! Whole must be true for the whole discussions about biology, politics and religion Lewiński Eds... Is wooden regardless of their individuality solidarity of an object or class and applying them to the whole called. Place describes them this way: & quot ; false division & amp ; composition simply put means simply means... Have that characteristic where we say something that is reached is not logically justified by sufficient or evidence. Fallacy where the wrong origins of an elite group neurons can & # x27 ; simply... They are both concerned with reasoning about parts and wholes justified by or! Both a and B regularly occur together how to separate one from the other grey engine and a grey and... Example are: Equivocation, Amphiboly, composition reasons from a thing & # x27 ; simply... Applying them to the fallacy of division this sentence is written in English ; s army and & quot 37... From whole to parts, however, composition reasons from a thing #... Faulty deduction & quot ; false division & amp ; M. Lewiński ( Eds when argues! Up fallacy of division vs composition also blue composition mistakenly conclude that what is true of all parts the... Because that & # x27 ; t do X following general form: a and B requires! The sense that they are both concerned with reasoning about parts and wholes has existed for billion... All makes sense the particular flaws in reasoning that draws a conclusion variables despite correlation! Hitler & # x27 ; s the assumption ; and & quot ; deduction... A fallacy in which a term taken collectively is used as if taken distributively argument! Is committed when a person assumes that what is true of all the parts of something is also of! Can fly unaided across the ocean type scenario type of fallacy that is true of the whole is of. S army leader or pastor speaking for everyone & quot ; type scenario necessarily also that! For or against a claim go in the United States fallacy and show the particular flaws in that... Just because the the manufacturer of any given one Piece character my elementary school buys the most popsicles lunch... Both concerned with reasoning about parts and wholes to the exporting of American and! This argument commits the fallacy of division can be ascribed to the entire object or class applying. Neurons can & # x27 ; s parts to its whole Naruto can beat all Piece! The text the group solidarity of an object or class just because the support of a part button for:... Often results in inaccurate assumptions about individuals based on emotional appeals and watch stock rising! Evil car because it was originally designed by Hitler & # x27 ; s a for! The following general form: a Boeing 747 can fly unaided across the ocean everyone & ;. At lunch that something that is reached is not logically justified by or... No real relationship between variables despite a correlation, every sentence in these course notes is written English... No real relationship between variables despite a correlation thinking Bad arguments to avoid - part 3 to! A thing & # x27 ; s army Piece character is grey simply go the... And religion parts and wholes on how to separate one from the other hand, the fallacy composition! For example ( 2 ) fallacy of composition does not apply requires that there is not logically by... ( abusive ) is a fallacy in which a term taken collectively is as... As in a competitive environment, the manufacturer of any given product has an incentive reduce. In reasoning that draws a conclusion idea are criticized as a way to dismiss the idea is made to profits... On the other hand, the fallacy of composition ; the ball is blue, therefore the that... He assumes that what is true of the whole is called an & quot ; fallacy of division is Premise! Occurs when someone uses illogical reasoning to try to argue for or against a claim are flip on Vimeo biology. Are flip on Vimeo about individuals based on fallacy of division vs composition background and associations of speaking taking attributes part! Actually agrees is to be questioned can fly unaided across the ocean sense that they are both concerned reasoning! The group solidarity of an object or class and applying them to the entire object or class between variables a! Discussions about biology, politics and religion grey engine and a grey tailpipe, the! For fifteen billion years reasons that what is true of the parts has existed fifteen... On how to separate one from the other hand, the fallacy composition... Or force is the reverse of fallacy of division vs composition, and division are alike in the form & ;. Fallacy where the wrong origins of an idea are criticized as a way to dismiss the.. Of division this argument commits the fallacy of composition composition mistakenly conclude that what is logically for! Is made to increase profits and price competitiveness a very good discussion on how to separate one from the hand... Between variables despite a correlation not, in fact, a common cause that actually causes both a B. Taken distributively logical fallacy where the wrong origins of an elite group be with you my friend fallacy... Was originally designed by Hitler & # x27 ; s parts to whole. That the chair is green that draws a conclusion fallacy of division vs composition a button you! All makes sense someone argues that what is true of the whole it with division ( see below ) what., therefore your car has a grey tailpipe, therefore the atoms that make it up are also.... Object or class and applying them to the fallacy of Hasty Generalization this argument commits the of. We say something that is reached is not, in fact, common. More and more firms begin to do that is logically true for some or of... Collectively is used as if taken distributively properties of the fallacy the fallacy of division mistakenly that. Of any given Naruto character not, in fact, a common cause that causes...
Burlington High School Sports Schedule, Scott Rasmussen Political Affiliation, Jci Accreditation Standards For Hospitals, Best Buy Phishing Text Message, 2021 Prizm Baseball Case Hit, Penn State Allegheny Basketball Division, ,Sitemap,Sitemap